Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The Brazilian Journal of Public Policy is intended to be an instrument to publish doctrinal and scientific aspects related to the interaction between public policy and law. We look for papers related to governance, integration, citizen participation, development and other issues involving the State, Society and Law.

The Brazilian Journal of Public Policy follows three main editorial lines:

I) Democracy, Policies of State and Government and their related legal aspects: new trends in Constitutional and Administrative Law ; Theory of public policies ; Government system; Electoral system and citizenship; Political Party system and constitutional reform.

II) Economic and Social Development Public Policies and their relation to Law: Economic development and local/regional production policies; Sustainable development and environment; Human development and Administration of government action.

III) Public Policy Assessment: Theories of evaluation of public policy; Methodology of evaluation of public policies and development policies; Legal methodology of public policy analysis, Results of analysis of public policy, Research in sectorial public policy.

Articles published in the BJPP must fit into at least one of the themes mentioned above. Eventually, at the discretion of the editorial board, a special issue of the Journal can be prepared and dedicated to only one of the thematic axes, or even one of its subdivisions.


IMPORTANT NOTE:

The Brazilian Journal of Public Policy receives, free of charge, original articles in Portuguese, English and Spanish. No fees are charged during the evaluation and publication process. Thus, after peer review, articles are released at no cost to the author and the reader.

 

Section Policies

Artigos

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Outros Temas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Edição Completa

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Poder Constituinte

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Jurisdição constitucional e democracia

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Constitucionalismo transformador e Ius constitucionale commune na America Latina, marco teórico

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Novo contitutionalismo Latino-americano

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Direitos fundamentais

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Povos indígenas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Gênero, Raça e Direito

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Direito Constitucional Ambiental

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Seção I: Convidado Especial

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Seção II: Dossiê Temático - Parte Geral: Aspectos Teóricos

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Parte Geral: Aspectos Teóricos

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Seção II: Dossiê Temático - Parte Específica: Incidências Concretas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Seção III: Temas Gerais

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Direitos fundamentais, hermenêutica e meio ambiente

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Direitos da natureza

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Povos indígenas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Ecofeminismo

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Instrumentos e incentivos para a concretização da proteção ao meio ambiente

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Acesso à justiça em matéria ambiental

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Mudanças climáticas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas: aspectos gerais

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas e COVID-19

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas e accountability

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em matéria de saúde

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Outras políticas públicas em espécie

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Temas Gerais

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Resiliência democrática: contribuições do constitucionalismo transformador contra o retrocesso

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Refundação democrática: contribuições do constitucionalismo transformador a uma nova ordem constitucional

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Diálogo entre ordens internacionais e nacionais: o constitucionalismo transformador na América Latina

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Diálogo entre ordens internacionais: o constitucionalismo transformador entre regiões

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Povos indígenas e transformação

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Grupos vulneráveis e transformação

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Direitos humanos, empresas e transformação

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Outras perspectivas sobre transformação

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Licitações e contratos públicos: parte geral

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Accountability e controle

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Eficiência

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Contratação pública no direito estrangeiro

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas e institucionalidade

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas, grupos vulneráveis e litígios estruturais

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas e ação restaurativa

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Diagnóstico e políticas públicas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Saúde

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Trabalho

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Gênero

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Decolonialidade e contra-hegemonia

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Problemas e perspectivas da relação entre o Direito Penal e o Direito Processual Penal

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas de proteção a grupos vulneráveis

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas e ambiente digital

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Temas diversos em políticas públicas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas, desenvolvimento e justiça

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em tecnologia

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em matéria alimentar

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em educação

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Pública pública em saúde

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em saneamento

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Política pública urbana

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas ambientais

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas direcionadas a grupos minoritários

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Problemas e perspectivas da relação entre o Direito Penal, Direito Processual Penal e a política criminal

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Fundamentos do sistema jurídico-penal

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Direito Penal

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Direito Processual Penal

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Política criminal

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Os contornos sistêmicos do Direito Administrativo Sancionador brasileiro e a sua relação com o Direito Constitucional

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas, pobreza e desigualdade

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas, indústria e finanças

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em meio ambiente

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em saúde

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas voltadas à administração pública

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas, justiça e formas alternativas de solução de controvérsias

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em matéria penal

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Temas de Direito Constitucional e Eleitoral

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em desenvolvimento sustentável

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em direito digital

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em regulação financeira e fiscal

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Intervenção de atores nacionais em políticas públicas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Políticas públicas em matéria de grupos minoritários

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Outros temas em políticas públicas

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The process of evaluating articles and reviews comprises two phases. First aimed at analyzing the suitability of the work to the editorial line (Editorial Board). The second on evaluation of the content and quality of work. This second phase is performed by the peer review process, that is, articles will be submitted for approval at least two independent reviewers, following a Double blind review. In other words, papers will be sent for evaluation without the author identifying himself or herself and authors would not be able to identify reviewers.

Reviewers have 15 days to answer, in order to be paid. Normally, authors will have an answer in a few days, but sometimes, it is needed to send the paper to various reviewers, and the final answer will take longer.

 

Publication Frequency

RBPP is a regular publication, quarterly published since vol 6. number 2, 2016. Each year a volume with three issues is published.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content since freely available scientific knowledge supports a greater global democratization of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and allows them to create permanent archives of the journal for the preservation and restoration

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

To ensure honesty and academic integrity, the Brazilian Journal of Public Policy follows the Code of Conduct and Guidelines of best practices for Editors prepared by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE 2011). The commitment to ensure good ethical and deontological practices must be assumed by all the editorial staff, authors and reviewers.

Therefore, according to the recommendations established by the Committee on Publication Ethics, each of the parties involved in the evaluation process and publication of the proposed articles should, at least, commit to the following:

Editors duties:

• Be responsible for the content of the journal as a whole;
• Strive to meet the interests of readers, authors and members of the Editorial Board, as well as keep them informed about the objectives and editorial policy of the journal;
• Evaluate the proposed articles solely on their academic merits, disconsider the nature of the authors, their institution and their race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy.
• Do not use unpublished information for their own research without the express consent of the author;
• Ensure the existence of a fair scientific process of evaluation, impartial and timely, as well as transparency in Editing and publication of the manuscripts;
• Identify and report cases of possible plagiarism or duplicate publication
• Ensure the confidentiality of the manuscripts;
•Constantly improve the journal;

Authors duties:

• Submit articles with an objective discussion, resulting from an important research work. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Any form of plagiarism, fraudulent statements or knowingly inaccurate data are unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
• Do not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal;
• Ensure that the submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere, in any language, and that the authors have used the work and / or words of others, citing appropriately.
• Follow the laws and conventions of copyright. Material protected by copyright (eg, tables, figures or extensive quotes) should be reproduced only with proper acknowledgment and permission.
• In case of joint authorship, it should be guaranteed the consensus in approving the final version of the manuscript for evaluation or publication;
• When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his own published work, it is his obligation to immediately notify the Editorial staff of the journal and work with them to retract or correct the article.

Duties of Reviewers:

• Assist the editor in making editorial decisions;
• Ensure confidentiality during the peer review process;
• Demonstrate the existence of conflict of interest or impossibility in evaluation;
• Call the editor's attention to any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any published article which the reviewer has personal knowledge.
• Prepare reviews without personal criticism to the author. Reviewers must clearly express their perspectives with arguments.
• Do not use for their own benefit the ideas obtained through the evaluation process;
• The recommendation to accept or reject an article should be based on its importance, originality and clarity, as well as the validity of the study and its integration within the scope of the journal;
• The review should be objective and recommendations should be based on solid arguments for the authors to improve the text.
• Recommend relevant publications when they are not mentioned;
• When the manuscript does not fit in the reviewer’ research area or when it is known that the deadline will not be met, he/she shall inform the editors;
• Respect deadlines.

For more information see the document bellow:

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2011, March 7). Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Retrieved from:

http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf

 


Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia